BENCHMARKING PROGRAMMES

Know exactly where your product stands – and where it needs to go.

Benchmarking is one of the most commercially direct things consumer research can do for a food or drink brand. It tells you not just how your product performs in isolation, but how it performs against the products your consumers are actually choosing between.<br /> FIS Group runs benchmarking programmes across every format and scale – from a biannual sense check to large ongoing programmes that track quality across retailer ranges and seasonal supply. With 40 years of category data behind us and senior food and drink specialists leading every project, the findings go beyond scores to give you a clear read on where you stand, where the gaps are and what they mean commercially.

Discuss a Benchmarking Programme

Three programme formats, scoped against benchmarking scope and engagement depth.

Benchmarking Programmes flex against the scope of the work and the depth of the engagement. The three formats below are the typical shapes, with the right one chosen at programme consultation rather than assumed.

Six commercial use cases, written as scenarios a buyer will recognise from their own brief. The aim is for the reader to see their question on this list and self-select.

Six commercial use cases, written as scenarios a buyer will recognise from their own brief. The aim is for the reader to see their question on this list and self-select.

Six commercial use cases, written as scenarios a buyer will recognise from their own brief. The aim is for the reader to see their question on this list and self-select.

Six commercial use cases, written as scenarios a buyer will recognise from their own brief. The aim is for the reader to see their question on this list and self-select.

Brand performance benchmarking for strategic positioning

You need ongoing benchmarking of brand performance vs competitor set to inform strategic positioning decisions: market share trajectory, brand health metrics, consumer preference dynamics, competitive momentum. Benchmarking Programmes provides the ongoing brand performance benchmarking with senior interpretation translating the data into strategic positioning direction. Particularly relevant for brands managing strategic positioning evolution across multi-year cycles.

Innovation pipeline benchmarking against sector

You are benchmarking your innovation pipeline against sector innovation trajectories: pipeline scale, innovation cadence, success rates, category coverage, novel space identification, emerging competitive innovation. Benchmarking Programmes provides ongoing innovation pipeline benchmarking that informs pipeline scoping decisions and strategic innovation investment. The benchmarking surfaces where your pipeline is ahead, where it is behind, and where novel space exists that competitors have not yet occupied.

Consumer perception benchmarking vs competitor brands

You need ongoing benchmarking of consumer perception of your brand vs competitor brands: brand image dimensions, distinctive ownership, consumer relevance, premium credibility, trust and quality perception, emotional connection. Benchmarking Programmes provides the consumer perception benchmarking that informs brand positioning, communication strategy and consumer-facing commercial decisions, with the methodology calibrated against food and drink consumer perception reality.

Channel performance benchmarking for commercial planning

You need ongoing benchmarking of channel performance vs sector norms: distribution rates, channel mix, e-commerce penetration, foodservice presence, premium channel positioning, convenience channel performance. Benchmarking Programmes provides the channel benchmarking that informs commercial planning, retailer conversations and channel strategy decisions. Critical for brands managing channel mix evolution across changing sector channel dynamics.

Premium positioning benchmarking

You operate in premium tier (or want to) and need benchmarking of premium positioning vs other premium players: price positioning, premium credibility, premium consumer reach, premium channel presence, premium occasion ownership. Benchmarking Programmes provides premium-specific benchmarking calibrated for premium tier reality, with the methodology recognising that premium dynamics work differently from mainstream category dynamics.

Sustainability and ESG benchmarking

You need benchmarking of sustainability and ESG performance vs sector norms and competitor commitments: ingredient sustainability, packaging environmental performance, carbon commitments, social responsibility positioning, sector-leading practices. Benchmarking Programmes provides sustainability benchmarking calibrated for food and drink sector reality, with the methodology recognising the specific sustainability dimensions that matter for food and drink consumer audiences and commercial buyers.

Food and drink is all we do

We are not a generalist competitive intelligence provider running food and drink work alongside cross-sector services. Food and drink is the only sector we work in, and our Benchmarking Programmes are scoped exclusively for food and drink commercial reality rather than as one sector slice of broader cross-sector competitive methodology. Generic competitive intelligence providers can deliver competitive data at sector breadth; sector specialists can deliver benchmarking calibrated against the specific commercial reality of food and drink strategic decisions. The sector specialism is what makes the benchmarking value justify the programme engagement over generic alternatives.
That focus is why we work with 11 of the UK’s top 40 food and drink brands.

Meet the Team

How Benchmarking Programmes connects to other insight work

Benchmarking Programmes provides the ongoing competitive context layer; other insight services complement the benchmarking at different brief depths or alongside different commercial questions. Below are the most common routes from Benchmarking Programmes to related work.

View our case studies

See All Case Studies

FAQs

Engagement structure and commercial purpose. One-off competitive analysis is commissioned reactively for specific competitive questions at defined moments, with the engagement focused on the specific question and ending when the analysis is delivered. Benchmarking Programmes deliver ongoing benchmarking across the year through regular wave touchpoints, with the engagement designed for continuous strategic decision-making rather than for specific question handover. Different commercial questions: one-off work for specific competitive questions, programme work for ongoing competitive context. Many brands commission both: programme work for ongoing context, one-off work for specific bespoke depth on emerging competitive questions.

Sector specialism and interpretive depth. Generic competitive intelligence providers operate across sectors with methodology calibrated for cross-sector breadth, food and drink benchmarking delivered as one sector slice of broader methodology. Our Benchmarking Programmes are scoped exclusively for food and drink: competitive dimensions match how food and drink commercial decisions are made, methodology calibration reflects food and drink sector reality, senior food and drink specialists run the interpretive layer rather than analytical teams without sector specialism. Generic providers deliver competitive data at sector breadth; sector specialists deliver benchmarking calibrated against the specific commercial reality.

Yes, and this is the standard approach. Benchmarking Programmes are designed to benchmark against the specific competitor set the brand actually competes with rather than against generic sector samples. Competitor set is agreed at programme framework design, scoped against the brand’s strategic competitive context (direct competitors, aspirational benchmarks, emerging competitive threats, category leaders depending on the brief). The competitor specificity is what makes the benchmarking strategically useful rather than just analytically interesting.

Multiple data sources integrated: sector-specific data sources for food and drink commercial performance, consumer perception data through FIS Group consumer engagement, channel data through our retailer and foodservice relationships, market and sales data through established sector sources, client-side internal data where shared. The data integration is methodologically scoped against the specific benchmarking framework, not generic data application. Senior food and drink specialists handle the data integration to ensure the benchmarking inputs are calibrated against food and drink commercial reality.

Yes, programme engagement includes bespoke benchmarking capability scoped within the programme rather than requiring separate project commissioning. Bespoke benchmarking within the programme typically covers: specific deep-dive competitive analysis emerging from regular wave findings, custom benchmarking dimensions added during the programme cycle, ad hoc competitive intelligence requests on emerging competitive threats. The bespoke capability is built into the programme engagement so the brand team can flex the benchmarking against emerging strategic needs.

Depends on the programme wave cadence. Quarterly waves deliver benchmarking within four to six weeks of wave fieldwork completion. Semi-annual waves typically deliver benchmarking within six to eight weeks of fieldwork completion. Annual waves deliver benchmarking within eight to twelve weeks of fieldwork completion. The wave structure is designed for strategic decision cycles rather than for real-time competitive monitoring (real-time monitoring briefs are better served by other tools). Wave timing is documented at programme framework design.

Annual programme engagement with the format selected at programme consultation: focused benchmarking programme for single dimension or focused competitor set, strategic benchmarking programme for multi-dimensional with sustained advisory, portfolio benchmarking programme for brand portfolio work. Multi-year engagement available for brands committed to sustained ongoing benchmarking. Engagement structure is scoped at consultation rather than fixed, so we can flex the programme against the brand’s actual strategic decision-making rhythm rather than against a generic programme template.

Ongoing competitive context embedded in your strategic work rather than periodic benchmarking reports. Specifically: regular benchmarking wave deliverables across the programme cycle, senior interpretation sessions with the client team alongside wave deliverables, sustained access to senior food and drink specialists for benchmarking-related strategic questions between scheduled waves, cumulative benchmarking trajectory that compounds across the programme duration. Documentation accompanies the engagement (wave reports, interpretation sessions, supporting analysis) but the deliverable is the sustained competitive context rather than the documentation alone.

Yes, in markets where we have established sector relationships and benchmarking data infrastructure. UK and European Benchmarking Programmes run through our existing relationships and data sources. Selective US and UAE benchmarking for specific briefs. International benchmarking has higher operational complexity than single-market because the competitive dynamics, data infrastructure and methodology calibration vary materially between markets in ways that affect benchmarking credibility. We will scope international capability honestly at the programme consultation.

Programme-based, scoped against the format (focused, strategic, portfolio), the benchmarking dimensions in scope, the competitor set size, the geographic scope, the wave cadence and the engagement duration. Focused single-market UK benchmarking programme is the lowest entry point; strategic multi-market portfolio benchmarking programmes are the highest. We give a clear, all-in programme quote at consultation with no hidden extras, and we will tell you straight if your needs would be better served by one-off competitive analysis, Syndicate Studies subscription, or another service combination at proportionate cost.

Got a brand where ongoing competitive context is what protects strategic position?

Tell us what benchmarking your team needs, the competitive dimensions that matter, the competitor set you benchmark against, the strategic decisions the benchmarking has to inform, the engagement model you prefer and the timeline. We will tell you whether Benchmarking Programmes is the right tool, what programme format makes sense and what it will cost. Where one-off competitive analysis, Syndicate Studies subscription, or another approach would be better, we will recommend the right alternative honestly.

Contact Us